Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.71 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Baylor vs. UT Houston
#21
(01-22-2018, 01:12 AM)Trigger Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 12:41 AM)Guest Wrote: Baylor historically dominated but bad decisions by medical school leadership devastated most training programs. Still the neurosurgery training at Baylor is probably still a better choice than the other two in town. Luckily the bad decision makers at Baylor are either long since fired or dead (feigin).

How does UT Southwestern stack up against the Houston programs (specifically Baylor and UTH)?

More stable and has less competition in the area compared to Houston.
Reply
#22
(01-22-2018, 01:03 PM)Guest Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 01:12 AM)Trigger Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 12:41 AM)Guest Wrote: Baylor historically dominated but bad decisions by medical school leadership devastated most training programs. Still the neurosurgery training at Baylor is probably still a better choice than the other two in town. Luckily the bad decision makers at Baylor are either long since fired or dead (feigin).

How does UT Southwestern stack up against the Houston programs (specifically Baylor and UTH)?

More stable and has less competition in the area compared to Houston.
yeah baylor was completed destroyed by ralph feigin many years ago. total narcissist.
Reply
#23
(01-22-2018, 02:45 PM)Guest Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 01:03 PM)Guest Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 01:12 AM)Trigger Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 12:41 AM)Guest Wrote: Baylor historically dominated but bad decisions by medical school leadership devastated most training programs. Still the neurosurgery training at Baylor is probably still a better choice than the other two in town. Luckily the bad decision makers at Baylor are either long since fired or dead (feigin).

How does UT Southwestern stack up against the Houston programs (specifically Baylor and UTH)?

More stable and has less competition in the area compared to Houston.
yeah baylor was completed destroyed by ralph feigin many years ago. total narcissist.
So where does UTH rank among the other programs? I know they have Arthur Day as their program director who is a big vascular name but what about other subspecialties?
Reply
#24
(02-03-2018, 08:10 PM)Guest Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 02:45 PM)Guest Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 01:03 PM)Guest Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 01:12 AM)Trigger Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 12:41 AM)Guest Wrote: Baylor historically dominated but bad decisions by medical school leadership devastated most training programs. Still the neurosurgery training at Baylor is probably still a better choice than the other two in town. Luckily the bad decision makers at Baylor are either long since fired or dead (feigin).

How does UT Southwestern stack up against the Houston programs (specifically Baylor and UTH)?

More stable and has less competition in the area compared to Houston.
yeah baylor was completed destroyed by ralph feigin many years ago. total narcissist.
So where does UTH rank among the other programs? I know they have Arthur Day as their program director who is a big vascular name but what about other subspecialties?
Bumping this back up after the previous post
Reply
#25
(02-04-2018, 12:40 AM)Guest Wrote:
(02-03-2018, 08:10 PM)Guest Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 02:45 PM)Guest Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 01:03 PM)Guest Wrote:
(01-22-2018, 01:12 AM)Trigger Wrote: How does UT Southwestern stack up against the Houston programs (specifically Baylor and UTH)?

More stable and has less competition in the area compared to Houston.
yeah baylor was completed destroyed by ralph feigin many years ago. total narcissist.
So where does UTH rank among the other programs? I know they have Arthur Day as their program director who is a big vascular name but what about other subspecialties?
Bumping this back up after the previous post
??
Reply
#26
http://www.houstonpress.com/news/arthur-...on-6743365
Reply
#27
Ever actually met the man or just judging him on some news story? Most who have worked with him seem to have huge respect for him. He’s was mentioned by two visiting professors while on my sub-i’s.
Reply
#28
Briefly, UTH has the busiest trauma program in the country and the lion's share of the vascular in town. All the training is currently done at one location. Baylor has better tumor and peds training, but is a more fellow dependent program (MDA alone has 3-5 fellows/yr). Residents go to a ton of hospitals (Texas Children's, MDA, Ben Taub, St Luke's).

Arguing that there is a significant difference in research between the two is simply inaccurate, Baylor ranks #12 in NIH funding and UTH #13 (this is counting MDA, see: http://www.brimr.org/NIH_Awards/2017/NIH...s_2017.htm). Tumor research is undoubtedly better at Baylor (Fred Lang: SPORE grant) while functional is better at UTH (Nitin Tandon: NIH brain initiative and RO1s).

The reputation of a place lags years behind the reality - this works in both directions. The actual quality of a place takes years to percolate down to the MS2s who post on this board. There is also a tendency to just regurgitate name brand places with no evidence. People retire or move on, some places reload and some places have to go through rebuilding. Look at BCM and UTH 10 years ago, honestly tell me which you think is getting better and which is losing ground. The BCM program was split in two - where do you guys think the Methodist program came from? Which program went from starting to 3 residents/yr in that time frame? UTH is one of the perenially "up and coming" places. That's going to continue to be the case for while. BCM is frequently cited as a upper/mid tier place.

To the guy posting articles about Art Day: ask anyone who has worked with Day and they will all tell you the same thing - operatively one of the best and a long time leader in resident education.

BCM is old guard with a tumor emphasis and UTH is new wave with a vascular focus. Both are busy. Both offer quality training far beyond most of the names that get tossed around here. But, the feel of the programs are very different. If you want to go to Houston, pick the one that fits you more based on the above info and do an away.
Reply
#29
Since UTH has nothing to do with MDA, and MDA is actually part of the Baylor program, those NIH statistics are closer than they should be. Also, the the functional/epilepsy program at Baylor is a lot stronger than at UTH if you are going by NIH funding.
Reply
#30
First, clearly never cited MDA as part of UTH. Second, who are you talking about at Baylor in functional - Yoshor? $80k in NIH funding of his own. Their DBS guy, Viswanathan, doesn't have NIH funding and barely publishes anything in functional (go do a pubmed search). This versus, NIH brain initiative grant and an RO1 by a neurosurgery PI (total: ~$1m/yr, Nitin Tandon) plus a more active DBS program that is actually publishing (pubmed Fenoy AJ).
Reply


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)