03-05-2022, 11:40 AM
Now that rank lists are in, curious to see folks top and bottom three this cycle
Top 3 bottom 3
|
03-05-2022, 11:40 AM
Now that rank lists are in, curious to see folks top and bottom three this cycle
03-05-2022, 12:30 PM
(03-05-2022, 11:40 AM)Guest Wrote: Now that rank lists are in, curious to see folks top and bottom three this cycle Top: mayo, penn, brigham. All seem to be top tier in terms of case volume/diversity while also having great opportunities in research and career development Bottom: Rutgers (scandal), UIC (on probation), LSU-NO (sketchy as fuck interview)
03-05-2022, 12:50 PM
25 interviews total, didn't have any interviews at crappy programs, so can only speak in a relative sense of what I experienced
top 3: UCSF, Penn, NYU. Felt like these were the most balanced and have the best trajectory over the next 10 years bottom 3: UW, UChicago, Georgetown. Red flags and toxic
03-05-2022, 03:15 PM
(03-05-2022, 12:50 PM)Guest Wrote: 25 interviews total, didn't have any interviews at crappy programs, so can only speak in a relative sense of what I experienced Lol at UCSF having a good trajectory. One of the worst trajectories of the ‘top’ programs, and I hear the residents feel like they’re in hell. I interviewed at 30+ programs and it was in my bottom 3.
03-05-2022, 05:19 PM
(03-05-2022, 03:15 PM)Guest Wrote:(03-05-2022, 12:50 PM)Guest Wrote: 25 interviews total, didn't have any interviews at crappy programs, so can only speak in a relative sense of what I experienced But this will chang now that Eddie Chang is at the helm. He is on the board of neuralink. Upward upward and upward. Not sure what’s wrong with UofC. Seems unfixable.
03-05-2022, 05:24 PM
(03-05-2022, 03:15 PM)Guest Wrote: Lol at UCSF having a good trajectory. One of the worst trajectories of the ‘top’ programs, and I hear the residents feel like they’re in hell. I interviewed at 30+ programs and it was in my bottom 3. Last five years they lost Lawton, Larson, McDermott and Berger. Meanwhile, Ames and Mummaneni are openly interviewing for chair positions. That leaves Chang, Starr, and Manley. The last two might also be looking for the door. Impossible to construe that as anything but a downward trajectory.
03-05-2022, 05:55 PM
(03-05-2022, 05:19 PM)Guest Wrote:(03-05-2022, 03:15 PM)Guest Wrote:(03-05-2022, 12:50 PM)Guest Wrote: 25 interviews total, didn't have any interviews at crappy programs, so can only speak in a relative sense of what I experienced Haha no. Eddie is definitely better than Berger, but 1) Berger is still around and scaring the shit out of people, and 2) Eddie was bred by UCSF and has been drinking the Kool Aid since he was a med student. Things won’t change very much, certainly not in the next 7 years. The toxicity at UCSF will long outlive it’s reign as an academic powerhouse.
03-05-2022, 07:26 PM
…let’s not derail the thread
Top : Wake, Jeff, Buffalo Bottom: Rutgers, UAB, Geisenger
03-05-2022, 08:14 PM
03-05-2022, 11:04 PM
(03-05-2022, 08:14 PM)Guest Wrote:(03-05-2022, 07:26 PM)Guest Wrote: …let’s not derail the thread Please tell us more. Why buffalo and wake so high? |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|