So obviously the math doesn’t add up…everyone enters residency wanting to do academic skullbase or something and leaves doing private practice spine/endovasc because that’s where the jobs are. Like 1 faculty retires every few years while the same program will graduate 2-3 residents a year. What does it actually take to get a job in academia if only like 10% of graduating residents would be able to get a spot? Is it easier if I went into spine to get an academic job than if I went for functional? Is academics pretty much only feasible if you are coming out of a brand name program? Give it to me straight.
Academic jobs are really not that hard to get. There are a number being advertised at the moment on various neurosurgery job listings sites. Most people go into PP or hospital employed positions for the simple reason that most of those positions are better jobs, ie higher pay, better hours, better organization to work with, and less bureaucratic hassle
Most Med students entering residency talk a big game about academics because they have no idea what they’re talking about. Once they actually get into the field, their goals change
nowadays its far easier to get an academic job than a good PP job. Academia is run by SJWs and feminist and if you are a man--good luck. I know a senior attending who has to get approval from his boss--a younger woman--just to take a day off. Wow.
The only men I know who are in academics are because: Too lazy/incompetent for PP, are SJWs themselves, or just want to use the connections to get their kids in the medical school/residency. The 3rd reason, I have observed, is the most common.
I think the realistic answer here is that the good academic jobs are very very competitive while the bad academic jobs are in reality just a lot worse then the plethora of private/hospital employed jobs out there. Bad academic jobs just have the worse of everything ie pay, respect, hours, freedom, and autonomy.
Totally agree with the above posts though that from a quality of life and financial standpoint academics (at almost any level) just cannot compete to the private/employed option.
Posts: 663
Threads: 2
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation:
5
05-31-2022, 02:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-31-2022, 03:00 PM by Focus.)
I agree your base pay will be lower if you do an academics but you have to factor in secondary income opportunities. If you have a strong academic standing, you can make a significant amount of money in speaker/advisory roles, IP generation, and industry collaboration. You may also be slightly more competitive for litigation consultation. You can do IP and industry as a PP too (in some ways it is easier/more potentially profitable) but the resources of an academic institution can be very helpful in terms of collaboration and validation. For example at my program we have a group who's job it is to take ideas from investigators and convert them into products or licenses with industry. Obviously they take a big chunk of the revenue in exchange but the reality is it takes a lot of the effort off of your hands. In fact, I recently had a patent submitted for a device that I probably spent 20 hours working on and they did the rest and are now building a prototype for me.
Is it feasible to go into PP for first few years while waiting for that “optimum” academic job opening? I guess will my PP history he a deterrent and looked upon poorly by academic centers looking to hire.