01-30-2018, 11:13 PM
Im struggling with prioritizing location vs. reputation with some programs on my rank list. For example:
Program A: Awesome location (love the city, culture etc..), not a bad program but not regarded as one of the best, somewhat inbred, residents aren't very involved in research, not too much placement in academics/producing future chairmen etc... I think I'd be happy in the program but would be afraid that I may be able to do better.
Program B: "Shithole" location (in that I wouldn't be happy with what the city has to offer), but residents were chill, program is highly-regarded, excellent fellowship and job placement, much more academic feel overall higher research output , etc...
Any tips from current residents or junior attendings? Would you sacrifice your quality of life in a given city for the reputation of the program?
Program A: Awesome location (love the city, culture etc..), not a bad program but not regarded as one of the best, somewhat inbred, residents aren't very involved in research, not too much placement in academics/producing future chairmen etc... I think I'd be happy in the program but would be afraid that I may be able to do better.
Program B: "Shithole" location (in that I wouldn't be happy with what the city has to offer), but residents were chill, program is highly-regarded, excellent fellowship and job placement, much more academic feel overall higher research output , etc...
Any tips from current residents or junior attendings? Would you sacrifice your quality of life in a given city for the reputation of the program?