02-02-2020, 09:37 PM
Guest
I wouldn’t say it’s a red flag but definitely something to consider. What does it say about the programs priorities? Either they are disorganized and can’t coordinate schedules or the chair doesn’t care about recruiting residents.
Totally agree. Seems like Yale and UCSD chairman too good to meet the residents they will train for the next 7 years.
(02-02-2020, 05:16 PM)Guest Wrote:(02-02-2020, 03:11 PM)Guest Wrote: I interviewed last Friday at sd. Weird to me that the chairman would prioritize a meeting over interviewing prospective residents in person. But hey what do i know
Yale’s first interview date the Chairman wasn’t around. And when I interviewed at UCSF Berger wasn’t there either so I don’t think it’s a red flag.
I wouldn’t say it’s a red flag but definitely something to consider. What does it say about the programs priorities? Either they are disorganized and can’t coordinate schedules or the chair doesn’t care about recruiting residents.
Totally agree. Seems like Yale and UCSD chairman too good to meet the residents they will train for the next 7 years.