Match List

[Guest]

You really don't need it. It's basically some variation of 240 to 260 for all but one or two applicants.

[Guest]

(03-19-2017, 01:27 PM)Guest Wrote: You really don't need it.  It's basically some variation of 240 to 260 for all but one or two applicants.

Two. One was 196--not the one we're all talking about either

[Guest]

(03-19-2017, 01:27 PM)Guest Wrote: You really don't need it.  It's basically some variation of 240 to 260 for all but one or two applicants.

That is completely false. 44/183 of US seniors who matched last year had a score 240 or less according to 2016 Charting Outcomes.

[socrates]

I'll post a summary later today of the stats that have been collected thus far.

[Guest]

(03-20-2017, 05:58 AM)socrates Wrote: I'll post a summary later today of the stats that have been collected thus far.

That would be great, thanks!

[socrates]

Here you guys go:

http://neurosurgeryhub.org/match_data.html

Thank you to everyone who took the time to put in their stats, we all appreciate it.

[Guest]

Any chance you could post the raw data/spreadsheet used to create the figures? I believe it was posted last year and was very informative.

[Guest]

Why are we still missing data from big programs? Cornell, NYU etc.

[guest2]

(03-20-2017, 11:08 PM)Guest Wrote: Any chance you could post the raw data/spreadsheet used to create the figures? I believe it was posted last year and was very informative.

^^second this. This would be more helpful than the figures. Would greatly appreciate it.

[socrates]

I'll see what I can do. Individual results vary significantly, however.