|
List by work hours
|
05-06-2017, 08:13 PM
The opinion that I formed based on my experiences as a medical student was 80-90% of programs will train you well. 5-10% have what might be arguably superior training and 5-10% have what might be arguably inferior training. Can't prove it, but that was my gestalt which is probably at least in part formed by the natural human tendency to want to order things coupled by limited processing capacity to objectively compare multiple factors at once.
05-07-2017, 02:29 PM
05-07-2017, 02:49 PM
05-07-2017, 07:58 PM
HAnd Jefferson does nothing much outside of endovascular
05-07-2017, 08:26 PM
Pitt, usc, Seattle, barrow
05-07-2017, 08:51 PM
Guys, ALL nsg programs are double scrubbed most of the time. There is 7 freaking years of residents.
05-07-2017, 10:03 PM
05-07-2017, 10:15 PM
(05-07-2017, 10:03 PM)Guest Wrote:(05-07-2017, 02:29 PM)Guest Wrote:(05-06-2017, 06:50 PM)Guest Wrote: Which are the specific programs that train you well? UVa is still a good program. The only problem is it seems to be borderline between very tough and malignant. Training is still top notch. (05-07-2017, 07:58 PM)Guest Wrote: HAnd Jefferson does nothing much outside of endovascular Jefferson does plenty outside of endovascular. Lots of skull base and functional.
05-07-2017, 10:54 PM
Seattle and usc
High volume and academic
05-08-2017, 09:40 AM
Barrow, Carolinas - lots of operating, and largely elective volume
Pitt - huge volume Seattle, USC, Tennessee - lots of operating, but huge trauma centers so your call sucks Utah is not a place to go if you want to operate |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
