Interview Invites 2019-2020

[Guest]

(09-28-2019, 02:35 PM)Guest Wrote: Crazy that 247 is considered low score.

There you go...

[Guest]

(09-28-2019, 02:35 PM)Guest Wrote: Crazy that 247 is considered low score.

It’s not.

[Guest]

Lol, sarcasm people

[Guest]

(09-28-2019, 03:37 AM)Guest Wrote:

(09-28-2019, 12:11 AM)Guest Wrote:

(09-27-2019, 11:32 PM)Guest Wrote: Duke is a fuckin joke doin shit like this

---

(09-27-2019, 11:32 PM)Guest Wrote: Duke is a fuckin joke doin shit like this

Duke thinks they are a top 10 program but have very mediocre residents. Can’t match anyone from Northeast or west coast elite programs. Have fun managing floor as PGY-3 and watching Friedman operate as chief if you match here. John Sampson is definitely a beast NIH funding wise but 0 residents involved with his research. Haglund kept the program relevant but really going to depreciate under Fecci. Heard he gave out interviews this year based on irrelevant things such as undergraduate major, hobbies, etc.

Do they have a lot of internal applicants this year?

4 I think

My classmate rotated there and liked her experience. She says there is only one home applicant but they are strong, well liked and will probably stay

[Guest]

(09-28-2019, 03:37 AM)Guest Wrote:

(09-28-2019, 12:11 AM)Guest Wrote:

(09-27-2019, 11:32 PM)Guest Wrote: Duke is a fuckin joke doin shit like this

---

(09-27-2019, 11:32 PM)Guest Wrote: Duke is a fuckin joke doin shit like this

Duke thinks they are a top 10 program but have very mediocre residents. Can’t match anyone from Northeast or west coast elite programs. Have fun managing floor as PGY-3 and watching Friedman operate as chief if you match here. John Sampson is definitely a beast NIH funding wise but 0 residents involved with his research. Haglund kept the program relevant but really going to depreciate under Fecci. Heard he gave out interviews this year based on irrelevant things such as undergraduate major, hobbies, etc.

Do they have a lot of internal applicants this year?

4 I think

(09-28-2019, 04:44 PM)Guest Wrote:

(09-28-2019, 03:37 AM)Guest Wrote:

(09-28-2019, 12:11 AM)Guest Wrote:

(09-27-2019, 11:32 PM)Guest Wrote: Duke is a fuckin joke doin shit like this

---

(09-27-2019, 11:32 PM)Guest Wrote: Duke is a fuckin joke doin shit like this

Duke thinks they are a top 10 program but have very mediocre residents. Can’t match anyone from Northeast or west coast elite programs. Have fun managing floor as PGY-3 and watching Friedman operate as chief if you match here. John Sampson is definitely a beast NIH funding wise but 0 residents involved with his research. Haglund kept the program relevant but really going to depreciate under Fecci. Heard he gave out interviews this year based on irrelevant things such as undergraduate major, hobbies, etc.

Do they have a lot of internal applicants this year?

4 I think

My classmate rotated there and liked her experience. She says there is only one home applicant but they are strong, well liked and will probably stay

Your classmate clearly only liked it because she is mediocre

[Guest]

FWIW. Originally poster here regarding the CNS meet and greet and it wasn’t for Duke

[Guest]

very quiet..

[Guest]

Thank god. I like having weekends off.

[Guest]

Matched last year. Wanted to float that there was talk last year at multiple schools that there may be a shift in the way that interviews are handled in relation to sub-is. It was found that multiple people were doing many many and specifically a few of the PDs mentioned here stated that coming back for an interview would not be a foregone conclusion. The idea is that giving a interview just because you rotated doesn’t make sense and is a waste if they don’t want you. I think you’re just seeing that sentiment being borne out, much to your dismay, during this interview season. We’re gonna become a little more like plastics and derm - ie they know exactly what they’re looking for before you walk in the door.

[Guest]

What would a single payer healthcare system do to The salary of neurosurgeons?